![]() Here, I'm comparing load temp & power consumption on 2 scenarios: Auto setting vs manual OC (4.1GHz) like what I've conducted in all tests. One will notice Zen+ actually have slightly higher temperature & power consumption if compared its predecessor, but this is due to the better algorithm in XFR 2.0 & Precision Boost 2, where more core(s) & higher boost frequency are allowed on 2000 series chips. Thankfully, AMD has being doing very good job in keeping the watt reasonably well since the introduction of Ryzen (1st generation). AMD been using soldering IHS onto the chip method, the only way to get rid high load temp issue is to improve power consumption. Temperature has always been a concern for flagship modern processors, be it blue camp (with their TIM issue which been haunting them for ages) & AMD (high power draw bulldozer anyone? ). OEM Samsung 128GB nVme drive (MZVPV128HEGM)ĬoolerMaster MasterLiquid ML240L RGB PushPullĭrastic improvement 4KiB Q8T8 test as well as 4KiB Q2T1 with the assistant from StoreMi (Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G as TierDrive). Innodisk (OEM ram manufacturer I supposed) 2 x 8GB DDR4 2400, rated CL18 Before I proceed further, below are the details of test bed used: X chips usually fare better in term of mileage, cpu as well as ram (IMC) but let us see whether it is applicable on this scenario. I have high hope for the bundle as I did okayish result with X470 Gaming Plus & Rylike 9 months back (link here: ), though I'm fully aware of the silicon lottery factor. Best thing is even my old & trust worthy B350 Tomahawk also having similar update, a nice touch from MSI I'd say. Now, both override & offset mode (with + & - option too) are here so picky users rejoice! This also proved that MSI do actually listen to the thoughts/input from the users of their products, not something practiced by all manufacturers. I'll just add a lil on the power delivery (VRM) side & onboard cooling solution, since that's one of the few criteria one should look into when purchasing AM4 board, to me at least.įinally the presence of offset voltage for both vcore & vsoc! If I'm not mistaken, on earlier days there was only fixed voltage (override mode) available hence some reviewers weren't that impressed. I'd skip the product details since bro Roy already did a very nice review here. Beside, if there's any bro here going for d 50th Anniversary chip & need a mid-high range board, this board will definitely be one of the recommended boards I'd suggest. Some mite ask why bothered to upgrade now since X570 + Ryzen 3000 series are near (Q3 from speculations), well I'm kinda like a random hardware tester + recycler, so whenever there is chance to upgrade with the price i can afford, I'll go for it. ![]() Is better when it comes time to combine all the mark values to form the system's PassMark rating.Had the pleasure to do a small upgrade to X470 Gaming Pro Carbon + R5 2600X (from B350 Tomahawk + R3 1300X) lately hence the thought of sharing it with fellow bros here. The average is then scaled up by multiplying the average with a 'magic' number in order to make the number larger. It is an straight average of the three values above. This is the number reported in the benchmark charts. Similar to the IOPS 32KQD20 test but uses 4KB blocks and a queue depth of 1. The amount of data actually transferred is highly dependent on the disk seek time. The file is read randomly a seek is performed to move the file pointer to a random position in the file, a 32KB block is read or written then another seek is performed using a queue depth of 20. ![]() Test (400 MB for non solid state drives, 800 MB for solid state drives). Disk Random Seek RW (IOPS 32KQD20)Ī large test file is created on the disk under Test conditions are otherwise the same as the read test. The file is written sequentially from start to end using a 32KB block size. The result is reported in MBytes/sec.Ī large file is written to the disk under test (400 MB for non solid state drives, 800 MB for solid state drives). Note that certain O/S features like file system compression, and settings in the PerformanceTest preferences window can alter the file size and test duration. The test uses uncached asynchronous file operations (with an IO queue length of 20). The file is read sequentially from start to end using a 32KB block size. A large test file is created on the disk under test (1 GB for non solid state drives, 2 GB for solid state drives).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |